|
William B. Grant, Ph.D.
SUNARC
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (colon and rectal cancer combined) is the third most frequent cancer in the U.S., with at least 120,00 new cases diagnosed per year. Dietary factors appear to play the most important role in the risk of colorectal cancer. Animal products and obesity are important risk factors, while vegetable products, other than sweeteners, and low body mass index (BMI) are important risk reduction factors. In addition, vitamin D, generally from solar ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation, is a very important risk reduction factor, and explains why colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S. is two times higher in the northeast than in the southwest. The latest results from the literature regarding risk and risk reduction factors for colorectal cancer are reviewed in this essay.
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (colon and rectal cancer combined) is the third most frequent cancer in the U.S. In 2004, there are expected to be 106,000 colon cancer cases and 41,000 rectal cancer cases, with 57,000 deaths due to both cancers. Only breast cancer (217,000 cases) and lung cancer (174,000 cases) are more frequent, and only lung cancer takes more lives (160,000) [Jemal et al., 2004].
Diet and colorectal cancer
The first study linking diet to colon cancer was by Dennis Burkitt, who found that Africans had much lower colon cancer rates than did Europeans [Burkitt, 1971a, b]. The African diet contained much more fiber, leading to much larger stools [Burkitt, 1971a, b]. However, epidemiologic evidence supporting the fiber hypothesis has been rather spotty. A recent study of colon cancer rates in South Africa concluded that the low prevalence of colon cancer in black Africans cannot be explained by dietary "protective" factors, such as fiber, calcium, vitamins A, C and folic acid, but may be influenced by the absence of "aggressive" factors, such as excess animal protein and fat, and by differences in colonic bacterial fermentation [O’Keefe et al., 1999]. On the other hand, a recent paper reported that the risk of colorectal adenoma (the precursor of colorectal cancer) decreased by 41% for every additional 5% unit of fiber intake/day [Mathew et al., 2004]. Red meat fat increased the risk by 20%, and white meat fat decreased the risk by 67% for every additional 5% unit of respective intake/day.
The primary risk factor for colon cancer is animal products, which are high in saturated fat and protein. Animal fat has been identified as a major risk factor for colon cancer in ecologic studies [Armstrong and Doll, 1975; Hursting et al., 1990]. As shown in Figure 1, when colon cancer mortality rates for 35 countries are plotted against calories derived from vegetable products as a fraction of total calories, there is a very high correlation [Grant, 1999]. In 1970, Americans obtained 34% of their calories from animal products [FAO, 1996]. This places the U.S. near the top of colon cancer mortality rates, with northern European countries having higher rates. The lowest rates are in Southeast Asian countries.
Figure 1. Colon cancer mortality rates for males aged 75+ years in 1986 vs. vegetable product calories/total calories. The adjusted r2 was greater than 0.90.

A recent study in the U.S. found that the “Western” diet was positively associated with colorectal cancer incidence while a “prudent” diet was inversely associated (protective) [Fung et al., 2003]. The prudent diet was characterized by higher intakes of fruits, vegetables, legumes, fish, poultry, and whole grains, while the Western pattern was characterized by higher intakes of red and processed meats, sweets, French fries, and refined grains [Fung et al., 2001]. Dietary sugar and high glycemic index foods are also risk factors for colorectal cancer [Slattery et al., 1997; Giovannucci 2001, 2002, 2003].
There are several reasons why animal products are a high risk factor for colorectal cancer, as well as breast and prostate cancer [Grant, 2002a; Grant, 2004]. One reason is that fat and protein increase the production of insulin like growth factor-I (IGF-I) [Holmes et al., 2002; Giovannucci et al., 2003]. IGF-I is strongly implicated in the etiology of colon cancer [Giovannucci, 2001, 2002; Kaaks and Lukanova, 2002; Reinmuth et al., 2002]. IGF-I plays an important role in stimulating cell growth and, hence, tumor growth.
In a multi-factor cohort study, age, gender, family history of colon or rectal cancer, height, body mass index, physical activity, folate, intake of red meat as a main dish, intake of processed meat and alcohol were significantly associated with colon cancer risk. However, only age and gender were associated with rectal cancer [Wei et al., 2004].
Exercise and colorectal cancer
Exercise is often found associated with reduced risk of colorectal and other cancers. There are several potential mechanisms for the association between physical activity and reduced risk for breast and colon cancer. One such mechanism is simply the bias due to the strong correlation between physical activity and other health factors. For example, people who exercise regularly are less likely to smoke, drink heavily, or use medications. Other mechanisms include the direct effects of exercise on the body, such as reduced obesity, hormonal and reproductive effects, mechanical effects , and enhancement of the immune system [McTiernan et al., 1998].
Geographical variation in colorectal cancer
When one inspects the geographic variation of colon and rectal cancer mortality rates in the U.S. [Devesa et al., 1999], one is struck by the large variation. For white males for the period 1970-94, the rates in the northeastern states are 2-3 times higher than in the southwestern states. For example, there were 23-30 deaths/100,000/year in New Jersey and New York, but only 9-15 deaths/100,000/year in New Mexico, western Texas, and Utah. For rectal cancer, the rates in New York were 5.8-8.6 deaths/100,000/year vs. 1.5-2.6 in western Texas. If one were to try to link diet to these data, one would predict a Scandinavian, high-animal product diet in the northeast, and the Southeast Asian, high-carbohydrate, high-vegetable product diet in the southwest. As anyone knows who has traveled much, this just isn’t the case.
Sunlight, vitamin D, and colorectal cancer
More than two decades ago, Garland and Garland [1980] first suggested that sunlight, through the production of vitamin D, could explain the geographic distribution of colon cancer mortality rates in the U.S. They also showed that people who had higher levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the circulating metabolite of vitamin D, 10-20 years prior to the study had lower rates of colon cancer [Garland et al., 1989]. Their ecologic study has been confirmed in a number of subsequent studies [Freedman et al., 2002; Grant, 2002b; Grant submitted]. To approximate UVB radiation (290-315 nm), the data for July 1992 obtained using the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) [Herman et al., 1999] were used in ecologic studies by Grant [2002b; submitted]. In the most recent study [Grant, submitted], a number of factors were added to the analysis such as degree of urbanization, lung cancer as an index for smoking, the fraction of white Americans with Hispanic heritage, and the fraction of those living below the poverty level, all state-averaged values. The results for the period 1970-94 are given in Tables 1 and 2. UVB had the strongest (inverse) association with both colon and rectal cancer in general, with degree of urbanization being an important risk factor for males. Six types of cancer (breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal, ovarian, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) were inversely correlated to solar UVB radiation and rural residence in combination. Thus, living in an urban region is considered an additional risk factor due to reduced exposure to solar UVB radiation. Those who live in urban regions spend more time indoors than those living in rural regions, and even when they are outside, tall buildings block direct sunlight. Smoking is also a risk factor for colorectal cancer, as supported by other papers in the literature [Terry et al., 2001; Giovannucci, 2002]. It is also interesting that a recent study in North Carolina did not find any dietary or other factors to explain why colon cancer rates are much higher for African-Americans than for white Americans; however, the study did not consider racial differences in absorption of UVB or serum vitamin D levels [Satia-Abouta et al., 2003].
Table 1. Regression results for cancer mortality rates, 1970-94, for white Americans in the 48 contiguous states plus DC. The fraction of the variance explained by each factor is approximately proportional to the adjusted r2 times t2 divided by the sum of the t2.
Cancer |
Sex |
Adjusted r2, F, * |
1st Term
(t, p) |
2nd Term
(t, p) |
3rd Term
(t, p) |
4th Term
(t, p) |
Colon |
M |
0.73, 44 |
UVB
-10.3, * |
Urban
6.7, * |
LungCanM
4.1, * |
|
| |
F |
0.59, 24 |
UVB
-6.8, * |
LungCanF
2.7, 0.009 |
Poverty
-2.1, 0.039 |
|
Rectal |
M |
0.76, 39 |
UVB
-10.2, * |
Hispanic
4.9, * |
Poverty
-4.3, * |
LungCanM
3.0, 0.005 |
| |
F |
0.60, 25 fail CV |
UVB
-6.4, * |
Poverty
-3.5, 0.001 |
Hispanic
2.8, 0.008 |
|
Table 2. Multivariate regression results for cancer mortality rates for African-Americans. Terms and abbreviations are as in Table 1.
Cancer Site |
Sex |
n, adj. r2, F, p |
1st Term
(t, p) |
2nd Term
(t, p) |
3rd Term
(t, p) |
4th Term
(t, p) |
Colon |
M |
41, 0.41, 10, * |
UVB
-2.7, 0.011 |
Urban
2.4, 0.024 |
LungCanM
1.9, 0.063 |
|
| |
F |
41, 0.46, 36, * |
LungCanF
6.0, * |
|
|
|
Rectal |
M |
38, 0.37, 8.1, * |
Urban
2.5, 0.016 |
UVB
-2.0, 0.051 |
LungCanM
2.0, 0.058 |
|
| |
F |
32, 0.20, 8.6, 0.006 |
UVB
-2.9, 0.006 |
|
|
|
Figure 2. Colon cancer mortality rates for white males in the U.S., 1970-94 vs. a regression based on UVB, degree of urbanization, smoking, and poverty level.

Despite the strong evidence that UVB reduces the risk of colorectal cancer, the other epidemiologic data are not as strong. Part of the reason for this is that many of the case-control and cohort studies, which are the models preferred by the health community, have considered only dietary vitamin D. Of the 11 cohort studies of dietary vitamin D and colon, rectal, or colorectal cancer, only 1 [Garland et al., 1985] found a statistically significant risk reduction associated with dietary vitamin D (p<0.05). For case-control studies, only 1 of 6 studies found a statistically significant risk reduction associated with dietary vitamin D [LaVeccia et al., 1997]. However, when total ingested vitamin D (diet plus supplements) was considered, most studies found a significant risk reduction (Table 3).
Table 3. Studies of total ingested vitamin D (diet and supplements) and colon, rectal or colorectal cancer [Grant and Garland, in press].
Outcome |
Type of Study,
Location |
Vitamin D Range (IU/day) |
Study Period
(years) |
OR or RR*
Highest to lowest, with 95% C.I. |
P for Trend |
Reference |
Colon cancer |
Cohort,
Iowa, USA |
<159 - >618
(quintiles) |
4 |
RR = 0.54 (0.35-0.84) |
0.02 |
Bostick et al., 1993 |
Colon cancer |
Cohort,
USA |
<161 - >613
(quintiles) |
6 |
RR = 0.66 (0.42-1.05) |
0.02 |
Kearney et al., 1996 |
Colorectal cancer |
Cohort,
USA |
<120 - >550
(septiles) |
12 |
RR = 0.42 (0.19-0.91) |
0.04 |
Martinez et al., 1996 |
Rectal cancer |
Cohort, postmenopausal women, Iowa |
<224 - >476
(tertiles) |
7 |
RR = 0.76 (0.50-1.16) |
0.20 (F) |
Zheng et al., 1998 |
Colorectal cancer |
Cohort, USA |
<110 - >525 (quintiles) |
5 |
RR = 0.71 (0.51-0.98) (M)
1.00 (0.68-1.47) (F) |
0.02 (M)
0.62 (F) |
McCullough et al., 2003 |
Colon cancer |
Case-control,
Wisconsin, USA |
<148->557
(quintiles) |
- - |
OR = 0.7 (0.4-1.1) |
0.05 |
Marcus et al., 1998 |
Colon cancer |
Case-control, N. Calif., Minn., Utah |
Supplements
Never vs. ever |
-- |
OR = 0.5 (0.2-1.1) (M)
0.6 (0.4-1.1) (F) |
0.01 (M)
0.21 (F) |
Kampman et al., 2000 |
*Odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR), highest compared to lowest group. 95% confidence limits are provided when available; M = males; F = females
The evidence for UVB and vitamin D as risk reduction factors for colorectal cancer is tabulated in Table 4. The criteria for causality in a biological system were used in making the determination. These criteria were originally proposed in a somewhat different form as postulates by Koch in the 19th century when he was making the case that bacteria were the cause of tuberculosis [Ligon, 2002]. Hill [1965] codified them in modern form, and they have been prioritized more recently [Potischman and Weed, 1999; Weed, 2000]. As can be seen, different approaches have different levels of confidence in whether the association can be considered causal, but when taken together, the case for the risk reduction role of vitamin D is unmistakable (see Table 4).
Table 4. Evaluation of the various approaches for determining the effect of UVB and vitamin D on colorectal cancer based on Hill’s criteria for causality [Hill, 1965] [Grant and Garland, in press].
Factor
Approach: |
Strength |
Consis-
tency |
Biologic Gradient |
Biologic
Plausibil-ity |
Tempor-
ality |
Confound-ing Factors
Included |
Analogy |
Ecologic |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
In Vitro |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
Cohort Diet |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
High |
Low |
Medium |
Diet plus Supple-ments |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
Medium |
Medium |
CC* Diet |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
Medium |
High |
CC: Diet, Supple-ments |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
Medium |
High |
CC: Serum |
Medium |
Medium |
Medium |
High |
High |
Medium |
High |
Summary |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
* CC = case-control
The mechanisms whereby vitamin D reduces the risk of colorectal cancer are well known. These mechanisms include increasing the absorption of calcium (for colorectal cancer) [Lamprecht and Lipkin, 2003], attenuating growth signals and metastasis, inducing cell death (apoptosis) and cell differentiation, and reducing the sprouting of blood vessels (a requirement for tumor growth) [Holt et al., 2002; van den Bemd and Chang, 2002].
Colorectal cancer is considered an epithelial cancer. Epithelia are the cell layers that cover all internal and external surfaces of the body. These cell layers can support rapid growth, and are most often the cells involved in cancers of all organs. UVB, through the production of vitamin D, has been identified as a risk reduction factor for 14 types of epithelial cancers [Grant, 2002b; Grant, submitted].
It should also be noted that colorectal cancer has a long incubation period, approximately 20 years. As the Japanese diet changed from the traditional high-fiber, low-fat one in 1947 to a more Western low-fiber, high-fat diet by 1963, a time lag of 23 years was identified between dietary changes and increased colon cancer mortality [Tsuji et al., 1996]. Cancer goes through lengthy initiation and development stages before it is detected [Weisburger, 1997; 2000].
Conclusions
In summary, colorectal cancer risk is related to diet, with animal products, especially meat, animal fat, and sugar as high risk factors. Alcohol consumption, smoking, and lack of exercise also contribute. Vegetable products, especially high-fiber ones, and calcium are generally risk reduction factors. UVB and vitamin D are also important risk reduction factors. Table 5 summarizes the information available in the literature regarding the risk and risk reduction factors for colorectal cancer. For optimal protection against colorectal cancer, one should adopt a diet and lifestyle that minimize the risk factors and maximize the risk reduction factors, consistent with other goals and objectives.
Table 5. A summary of risk and risk reduction factors for colorectal, colon, and/or rectal cancer and colorectal adenomas along with estimates of the degree of risk or protection.
Factor |
Mechanism |
Hazard Ratio (HR)
Odds Ratio (OR) Risk Ratio (RR) |
Reference |
Risk |
|
(larger numbers mean more risk) |
|
Animal product energy/total energy |
Insulin-like growth factor-I |
RR = 6-10 |
Grant, 1999
Giovannucci, 2001 |
Dietary glycemic load |
|
RR = 2.85 |
Higginbotham et al., 2004 |
Non-prudent diet (prudent diet is high in fruits, vegetables,
whole grains, fish and poultry) |
|
OR = 2.8 |
Slattery et al., 2003b |
Smoking |
|
RR = 1.9 for >20 cigarettes/day vs. none for those <50 years of age |
Colangelo et al., 2004 |
Overweight |
Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I |
RR = 1.9 for males, 1.2 for females
with BMI >32.5 vs. BMI 22 - 23.5 |
Murphy et al., 2000 |
Refined cereals and grains |
Insulin |
OR = 1.5 for amounts in tertiles |
Slattery et al., 1997b
Chatenoud et al., 1999 |
Risk reduction |
|
(smaller numbers mean less risk) |
|
Allium family vegetables (garlic, onions, leeks) |
Sulfur compounds are anticarcinogenic |
OR = 0.32 |
Levi et al., 1999
Knowles and Milner, 2001 |
Vitamin D |
Attenuate tumor growth signals, induce cell differentiation, death, reduce angiogenesis, increase calcium absorption |
RR = 0.4 for max UVB in U.S., rural residence |
Van den Bemd and Chang, 2002;
Lamprecht and Lipkin, 2003
Grant, submitted |
Aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) |
Reduction in inflammation?
(side effects include GI tract bleeding) |
RR = 0.49 for adenomas for >14 tablets/week
OR = 0.66 for use of NSAIDs |
van Leerdam et al., 2003; Lieberman et al., 2003
Chan et al., 2004 |
Fiber |
|
OR = 0.5 |
Slattery et al., 1997b |
Legumes (beans) |
|
RR = 0.53 for >2 times/week vs. <1 time/week |
Singh and Fraser, 1998 |
Exercise |
Plausible: changes in endogenous sexual & metabolic hormone levels & growth factors, decreased obesity & central adiposity, possibly changes in immune function |
OR = 0.55-0.60 for vigorous exercise |
Friedenreich and Orenstein, 2002 Slattery et al., 2003 |
Rural vs. urban residence |
UVB/vitamin D production |
RR = 0.6 |
Grant, submitted |
Folate |
suppress the development of tumors |
OR = 0.6 |
Harnack et al., 2002
Kim, 2003
Crott et al., 2004 |
Fish |
n-3 oils reduce inflammation |
OR = 0.6-0.7 for frequent consumption |
Yang et al., 2003 |
Whole grains |
Antioxidant properties of phytochemicals |
OR = 0.6
OR = 0.85 |
Slattery et al., 1997b
Levi et al., 1999
Adom and Liu, 2002 |
UVB irradiance in U.S. |
Vitamin D production |
RR = 0.64 |
Grant, 2002b;
Grant, submitted |
Hormone replacement therapy |
|
RR = 0.67 for current; = 0.92 for ever use |
Nanda et al., 1999 |
Calcium |
Inhibits dietary haem-induced colonic cytotoxicity and epithelial hyperproliferation |
OR = 0.65 for distal colon cancer, >1.25 vs. <0.5 g/day |
Sesink et al., 2001
Wu et al., 2002
Lamprecht and Lipkin, 2003 |
Vegetables |
|
OR = 0.7 for higher intake |
Slattery et al., 1997b |
Calcium |
|
OR = 0.74 for 1.2 g/day |
Lamprecht and Lipkin, 2003 Weingarten et al., 2004 |
Vegetarian diet |
|
RR = 0.85 in U.K. vs. non-vegetarian |
Sanjoaquin et al., 2004 |
While the risk and risk reduction factors discussed here are the findings of observational studies, and are likely generally correct, they have not necessarily been accepted or endorsed by the health community. Once they think the observational evidence is strong enough, they like to do carefully controlled double blind cross over studies to make sure that there is a causal relationship. Some observational studies, such as that finding that women who used hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after menopause, generally had better health habits, which was overlooked in the earlier studies. However, it was realized in more recent studies that the risk factors for various diseases such as breast cancer and strokes from HRT outweighed any long-term health advantages [Chlebowski et al., 2003; Rossouw et al., 2003; Wassertheil-Smoller et al., 2003], although HRT is still used by women trying to reduce menopausal symptoms. Therefore, anyone considering changing his or her diet or lifestyle in order to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer, or any other disease for that matter, should read the referenced papers as well as others that can be found for example at PubMed by clicking the “related articles” button associated with the reference paper. Note that it can take decades for the health system to fully accept and endorse new scientific methods, and that the American health care system is much more interested in secondary (examinations and prescription drugs) and tertiary (surgery and chemotherapy) prevention approaches than primary (diet and lifestyle), so it does behoove people to be more proactive in protecting their own health and well being.
References
(Note – abstracts for most of these papers can be found at PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ )
Adom KK, Liu RH. Antioxidant activity of grains. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:6182-7.
Armstrong B, Doll R. Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices. Int J Cancer. 1975;15:617-31.
Bostick RM, Potter JD, Sellers TA, et al. Relation of calcium, vitamin D, and dairy food intake to incidence of colon cancer among older women. The Iowa Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1302-17.
Burkitt DP. Epidemiology of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1971;28:3-13.
Burkitt DP. Possible relationships between bowel cancer and dietary habits. Proc R Soc Med. 1971;64:964-5.
Chan AT, Giovannucci EL, Schernhammer ES, et al. A prospective study of aspirin use and the risk for colorectal adenoma. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:157-66.
Chatenoud L, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, et al. Refined-cereal intake and risk of selected cancers in Italy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:1107-10.
Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD, et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003;289:3243-53.
Colangelo LA, Gapstur SM, Gann PH, Dyer AR. Cigarette smoking and colorectal carcinoma mortality in a cohort with long-term follow-up. Cancer. 2004;100:288-93.
Crott JW, Choi SW, Ordovas JM, Ditelberg JS, Mason JB. Effects of dietary folate and aging on gene expression in the colonic mucosa of rats: implications for carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:69-76.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Food Balance Sheets. Rome. 1996.
Freedman DM, Dosemeci M, McGlynn K. Sunlight and mortality from breast, ovarian, colon, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancer: a composite death certificate based case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:257-62.
Friedenreich CM, Orenstein MR. Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms. J Nutr. 2002;132:3456S-3464S.
Fung TT, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Hu FB. Dietary patterns and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1857-62.
Fung T, Hu FB, Fuchs C, et al. Major dietary patterns and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:309-14.
Garland CF, Garland FC. Do sunlight and vitamin D reduce the risk of colon cancer? Int J Epidemiol. 1980;9:227-31.
Garland C, Shekelle RB, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Dietary vitamin D and calcium and risk of colorectal cancer: a 19-year prospective study in men. Lancet. 1985;1:307-9.
Garland CF, Comstock GW, Garland FC, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colon cancer: eight-year prospective study. Lancet. 1989;2:1176-8.
Giovannucci E. Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and colon cancer: a review of the evidence. J Nutr. 2001;131:3109S-20S.
Giovannucci E. Modifiable risk factors for colon cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31:925-43.
Giovannucci E. Diet, body weight, and colorectal cancer: a summary of the epidemiologic evidence. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:173-82.
Giovannucci E, Pollak M, Liu Y, et al. Nutritional predictors of insulin-like growth factor I and their relationships to cancer in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:84-9.
Grant WB. Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer, The Townsend Letter, 1999;192:112-3
Grant WB. An ecologic study of dietary and solar UV-B links to breast carcinoma mortality rates. Cancer. 2002a;94:272-81.
Grant WB. An estimate of premature cancer mortality in the United States due to inadequate doses of solar ultraviolet-B radiation, Cancer, 2002b;94:1867-75.
Grant WB. A multicountry ecologic study of risk and risk reduction factors for prostate cancer mortality. Eur Urol. 2004;45:371-9.
Harnack L, Jacobs DR Jr, Nicodemus K, Lazovich D, Anderson K, Folsom AR. Relationship of folate, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, and methionine intake to incidence of colorectal cancers. Nutr Cancer. 2002;43:152-8.
Herman JR, Krotkov N, Celarier E, Larko D, Labow G. Distribution of UV radiation at the Earth's surface from TOMS-measured UV-backscattered radiances. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 1999;104:12,059-76.
http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/ery_uv/dna_exp.gif (accessed February 27, 2004).
Higginbotham S, Zhang ZF, Lee IM, et al. Dietary glycemic load and risk of colorectal cancer in the Women's Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:229-33.
Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:295-300.
Holmes MD, Pollak MN, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Dietary correlates of plasma insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 concentrations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:852-61.
Holt PR, Arber N, Halmos B, et al. Colonic epithelial cell proliferation decreases with increasing levels of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:113-9.
Hursting SD, Thornquist M, Henderson MM. Types of dietary fat and the incidence of cancer at five sites. Prev Med. 1990;19:242-53.
Jarvinen R, Knekt P, Hakulinen T, Aromaa A. Prospective study on milk products, calcium and cancers of the colon and rectum. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55:1000-7.
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:8-29.
Kaaks R, Lukanova A. Energy balance and cancer: the role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001;60:91-106.
Kampman E, Slattery ML, Caan B, Potter JD. Calcium, vitamin D, sunshine exposure, dairy products and colon cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:459-66.
Kearney J, Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, et al. Calcium, vitamin D, and dairy foods and the occurrence of colon cancer in men. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:907-17.
Marcus PM, Newcomb PA.The association of calcium and vitamin D, and colon and rectal cancer in Wisconsin women. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:788-93.
Martinez ME, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. Calcium, vitamin D, and the occurrence of colorectal cancer among women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1375-82.
Mathew A, Peters U, Chatterjee N, Kulldorff M, Sinha R. Fat, fiber, fruits, vegetables, and risk of colorectal adenomas. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:287-92.
Murphy TK, Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Kahn HS, Thun MJ. Body mass index and colon cancer mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:847-54.
Nanda K, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Simel DL. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:880-8.
O'Keefe SJ, Kidd M, Espitalier-Noel G, Owira P. Rarity of colon cancer in Africans is associated with low animal product consumption, not fiber. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1373-80.
Peters U, Sinha R, Chatterjee N, Subar, et al. Dietary fibre and colorectal adenoma in a colorectal cancer early detection programme. Lancet. 2003;361:1491-5.
Potischman N, Weed DL. Causal criteria in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:1309S-14S.
Reddy BS. Dietary fibre and colon cancer: epidemiologic and experimental evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;123:850-6.
Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-33.
Reinmuth N, Fan F, Liu W, et al. Impact of insulin-like growth factor receptor-I function on angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis of colon cancer. Lab Invest. 2002;82:1377-89.
Sanjoaquin MA, Appleby PN, Thorogood M, Mann JI, Key TJ. Nutrition, lifestyle and colorectal cancer incidence: a prospective investigation of 10998 vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:118-21.
Satia-Abouta J, Galanko JA, Potter JD, et al. Associations of total energy and macronutrients with colon cancer risk in African Americans and Whites: results from the North Carolina colon cancer study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:951-62.
Sesink AL, Termont DS, Kleibeuker JH, Van der Meer R. Red meat and colon cancer: dietary haem-induced colonic cytotoxicity and epithelial hyperproliferation are inhibited by calcium. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:1653-9.
Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:761-74.
Slattery ML, Benson J, Berry TD, et al. Dietary sugar and colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:677-85.
Slattery ML, Potter JD, Coates A, et al. Plant foods and colon cancer: an assessment of specific foods and their related nutrients (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1997b;8:575-90.
Slattery ML, Edwards S, Curtin K, et al. Physical activity and colorectal cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:214-24.
Slattery ML, Levin TR, Ma K, Goldgar D, Holubkov R, Edwards S. Family history and colorectal cancer: predictors of risk. Cancer Causes Control. 2003b;14:879-87.
Terry P, Ekbom A, Lichtenstein P, Feychting M, Wolk A. Long-term tobacco smoking and colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:585-7.
Tsuji K, Harashima E, Nakagawa Y, Urata G, Shirataka M. Time-lag effect of dietary fiber and fat intake ratio on Japanese colon cancer mortality. Biomed Environ Sci. 1996;9:223-8.
van den Bemd GJ, Chang GT. Vitamin D and vitamin D analogs in cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets. 2002;3:85-94.
van Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EA, et al. Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1494-9.
Wassertheil-Smoller S, Hendrix SL, Limacher M, et al. Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2673-84.
Weed DL. Epidemiologic evidence and causal inference. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14:797-807, viii.
Wei EK, Giovannucci E, Wu K, et al. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:433-42.
Weingarten M, Zalmanovici A, Yaphe J. Dietary calcium supplementation for preventing colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1:CD003548.
Weisburger JH. Dietary fat and risk of chronic disease: mechanistic insights from experimental studies. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97(7 Suppl):S16-23.
Weisburger JH. Prevention of cancer and other chronic diseases worldwide based on sound mechanisms. Biofactors. 2000;12:73-81.
Wu K, Willett WC, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Giovannucci EL. Calcium intake and risk of colon cancer in women and men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:437-46.
Yang CX, Takezaki T, Hirose K, Inoue M, Huang XE, Tajima K. Fish consumption and colorectal cancer: a case-reference study in Japan. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12:109-15.
Zheng W, Anderson KE, Kushi LH, et al. A prospective cohort study of intake of calcium, vitamin D, and other micronutrients in relation to incidence of rectal cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7, 221-5. |